Skip to main content
AIFilmSafe - Festival-Ready AI Filmmaking
Digital replica consent documentation and performer protection safeguards
legal

Deepfake Protection Guide

AB 2602, SAG-AFTRA digital replica rider, consent documentation, and technical safeguards for AI-generated likenesses.

Last updated May 2026

Deepfake Protection Guide for Filmmakers

Understanding Digital Replicas in Film

The use of digital replicas — AI-generated likenesses of real people — is one of the most legally complex areas in modern filmmaking. Whether you're using AI to de-age an actor, create a background extra, or generate a synthetic voice performance, you need robust consent documentation and technical safeguards.

AB 2602: California's Digital Replica Law

California Assembly Bill 2602, effective **January 1, 2025**, is the first U.S. state law specifically regulating the use of digital replicas in entertainment.

Key Requirements

  1. **Explicit consent required** — A performer's digital replica cannot be used without their informed, specific consent
  2. **Contract specificity** — General "likeness" clauses in standard contracts are NOT sufficient. The contract must specifically describe the intended use of the digital replica
  3. **Right to professional representation** — Performers have the right to have legal counsel or their union representative review digital replica terms
  4. **Duration and scope limits** — Consent must specify the duration and scope of permitted digital replica use
  5. **Posthumous protections** — Digital replicas of deceased performers require consent from their estate

What Counts as a "Digital Replica"

Under AB 2602, a digital replica includes any AI-generated or AI-manipulated:

  • Visual likeness (face, body, appearance)
  • Voice (cloned, synthesized, or manipulated)
  • Combined audiovisual representation

This applies whether the replica is:

  • Photorealistic or stylized
  • Based on training data from the performer's prior work
  • Generated from a scanning or motion capture session
  • Used in principal photography or post-production

Penalties for Non-Compliance

  • Civil liability for unauthorized use
  • Potential injunctive relief (production halt)
  • Statutory damages in addition to actual damages
  • Attorney's fees for the prevailing party

SAG-AFTRA Digital Replica Provisions

2026 TV/Theatrical Agreement (Ratified June 4, 2026 — Effective July 1, 2026)

The SAG-AFTRA 2026 TV/Theatrical Agreement includes the most comprehensive digital replica protections in any entertainment union contract. It establishes two categories of digital replicas:

**Employment-Based Digital Replicas** — created during employment with the performer's physical participation:

  • Producer must provide a "reasonably specific description" of all intended uses
  • Consent must be clear, conspicuous, and documented in the employment contract or a separate signed instrument
  • Use outside the original production requires separate bargaining and consent

**Independently Created Digital Replicas** — assets mimicking a recognizable performer without a direct employment arrangement:

  • Requires clear, conspicuous consent with prior bargaining
  • Must include a specific description of the intended use
  • First Amendment exception allows use for satire, parody, criticism, scholarship, or historical/biographical works

Key Protections Under the 2026 Agreement

| Requirement | Details |

|-------------|---------|

| **Informed Consent** | Producer must disclose all intended AI/digital replica uses before employment begins |

| **Compensation** | Performers entitled to compensation for creation and each use; residuals apply when a replica would normally trigger them |

| **Strike Suspension** | Performers can suspend consent for new digital replica material during a strike — replicas cannot cross picket lines |

| **Synthetic Performers** | AI-generated assets from a combination of performers require union notification and may trigger bargaining obligations |

| **Survival of Consent** | Digital replica consent generally survives the performer's death unless otherwise specified |

| **Semi-Annual Meetings** | SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP meet regularly to discuss AI training, compensation, and bias |

2025 Interactive Media Agreement (IMA)

Ratified in the summer of 2025, the IMA covers digital replicas in video games:

  • Clear, written, reasonably specific consent required
  • Compensation requirements for digital replicas and real-time generation
  • Limited exceptions for First Amendment-protected uses

For Non-Union Productions

Even if your production is non-union, the SAG-AFTRA standards represent industry best practices. Following them:

  • Protects you legally under AB 2602 and New York's Digital Replica Contracts Act
  • Makes your film more attractive to distributors and festivals
  • Demonstrates professional standards to E&O insurers
  • Future-proofs your production against evolving state and federal regulations

DGA Requirements

The DGA's 2023 Basic Agreement (still in effect; a tentative 2026 deal was announced June 9, 2026 but awaits ratification) includes these AI provisions relevant to digital replicas:

  • **Consultation Requirement**: Employers must consult with the director before using generative AI on creative elements, including digital replicas
  • **Human Performance Requirement**: AI is not a "person" — all DGA-covered duties must be assigned to a human
  • Directors retain creative involvement over AI-generated content in their films
  • Digital replicas of directors for behind-the-scenes content require separate consent

Technical Safeguards

Beyond legal documentation, filmmakers should implement technical safeguards to protect performers and demonstrate good faith compliance.

Content Authenticity

  • **Embed C2PA metadata** in all AI-generated assets containing digital replicas
  • **Maintain chain-of-custody logs** for all digital replica assets from creation through final delivery
  • **Use AI tools with built-in provenance tracking** when generating digital replicas

Data Protection

  • **Secure storage** for performer scans, voice recordings, and training data
  • **Access controls** — limit who can access digital replica assets and source materials
  • **Retention policies** — delete performer data when the agreed usage period expires
  • **Breach notification** — have a plan for notifying performers if their data is compromised

Watermarking

  • **Mark synthetic content** with invisible watermarks identifying it as AI-generated
  • **Preserve watermarks** through the post-production pipeline
  • **Document watermark status** in your AI Input Asset Ledger

Consent Documentation Checklist

For every performer whose digital replica you create or use:

  • [ ] Written consent obtained BEFORE any scanning, recording, or AI processing
  • [ ] Consent specifies EXACT intended uses (not general "likeness" language)
  • [ ] Duration and scope of digital replica rights clearly defined
  • [ ] Compensation for digital replica use negotiated and documented
  • [ ] Performer's right to review and approve final usage acknowledged
  • [ ] Training data usage (if any) separately consented and compensated
  • [ ] Union notification completed (if applicable)
  • [ ] Technical safeguards documented (storage, access, retention)
  • [ ] C2PA metadata embedded in all digital replica assets
  • [ ] Chain-of-custody log maintained for all digital replica assets

Risk Scenarios for Filmmakers

| Scenario | Risk Level | Required Documentation |

|----------|-----------|----------------------|

| De-aging an actor with AI | **High** | Full AB 2602 consent, SAG-AFTRA rider, C2PA metadata |

| AI-generated background extras | **Medium** | If based on real people: full consent. If fully synthetic: disclosure only |

| Voice cloning for ADR | **High** | Specific voice consent, performance compensation, usage limitations |

| Synthetic stunt doubles | **High** | Performer consent for likeness use, separate stunt safety documentation |

| AI-generated crowd scenes | **Low-Medium** | Disclosure in credits, no individual consent needed if no recognizable likenesses |

| Posthumous performance recreation | **Critical** | Estate consent, AB 2602 posthumous provisions, ethical review, guild notification |

EU AI Act Intersection

If your film will be distributed in the EU after August 2, 2026, digital replicas trigger the strictest Article 50 requirements:

  • Machine-readable marking is mandatory for AI-generated likenesses
  • Disclosure must be "clear and distinguishable" to the audience
  • Systems already on the market before August 2, 2026 have until December 2, 2026 to implement machine-readable marking
  • Penalties can reach €35 million or 7% of worldwide annual turnover for the most serious violations
  • See our EU AI Act Compliance Guide for full details

What You Should Do Now

  1. **Audit your production** — Identify every scene where AI creates or modifies a human likeness
  2. **Get consent early** — Don't wait until post-production to discuss digital replica rights
  3. **Use AIFilmSafe's Digital Replica Consent template** — Purpose-built for AB 2602 and SAG-AFTRA compliance
  4. **Document everything** — Use the AI Input Asset Ledger to track all digital replica assets
  5. **Brief your team** — Ensure your VFX supervisor, editor, and post-production team understand the documentation requirements
  6. **Consult your E&O broker** — Digital replicas are a specific area of inquiry on modern E&O applications